@InProceedings{MoraesEvPeToFeMa:2023:HeReLi,
author = "Moraes, Rog{\'e}rio Ferreira de and Evangelista, Raphael dos S.
and Pereira, Andre Luiz da S. and Toledo, Yanexis Pupo and
Fernandes, Leandro A. F. and Mart{\'{\i}}, Luis",
affiliation = "Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niter{\'o}i, Brazil and
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niter{\'o}i, Brazil and
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niter{\'o}i, Brazil and
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niter{\'o}i, Brazil and
Universidade Federal Fluminense (UFF), Niter{\'o}i, Brazil and
Inria Chile Research Center, Las Condes, Chile",
title = "Heuristics to reduce linear combinations of activation functions
to improve image classification",
booktitle = "Proceedings...",
year = "2023",
editor = "Clua, Esteban Walter Gonzalez and K{\"o}rting, Thales Sehn and
Paulovich, Fernando Vieira and Feris, Rogerio",
organization = "Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images, 36. (SIBGRAPI)",
keywords = "learned activation function, trainable activation function, linear
combination of activation functions.",
abstract = "Image classification is one of the classical problems in computer
vision, and CNNs (Convolutional Neural Networks) are widely used
for this task. However, the choice of a CNN can vary depending on
the chosen dataset. In this context, we have trainable activation
functions that are crucial in CNNs and adapt to the data. One
technique for constructing these functions is to write them as a
linear combination of other activation functions, where the
coefficients of this combination are learned during training.
However, if we have a large number of activation functions to
combine, the computational cost can be very high, and manually
testing and choosing these functions may be impractical, depending
on the number of available activation functions. To alleviate the
difficulty of choosing which activation functions should be part
of the linear combination, we propose two heuristics: Linear
Combination Approximator by Coefficients (LCAC) and Major and
Uniform Coefficient Extractor (MUCE). Our heuristics provide an
efficient selection of a subset of activation functions so that
their results are better or equivalent to the linear combination
that uses all 34 available activation functions in our experiments
(C34), considering the image classification problem. Compared to
the C34 function, the LCAC function was better or equivalent in
62.5%, and the MUCE function in 87.5% of the conducted
experiments.",
conference-location = "Rio Grande, RS",
conference-year = "Nov. 06-09, 2023",
doi = "10.1109/SIBGRAPI59091.2023.10347043",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/SIBGRAPI59091.2023.10347043",
language = "en",
ibi = "8JMKD3MGPEW34M/49KDKC2",
url = "http://urlib.net/ibi/8JMKD3MGPEW34M/49KDKC2",
targetfile = "Moraes-paper50.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "2024, Apr. 29"
}